I just heard a commentator on CNN mention that soon “They’ll be rolling out 5G,” as he talked about other innovations and changes the country will have to face in the near future. I wrote here about 5G last fall, reporting the outrage of many people who fear the health effects a number of experts are warning us about with this new technology that’s about to be forced on us. They see it as yet another example of high profit for a few and ever-faster communication a rush to get the next best, fastest thing despite inadequate testing.
I’m writing about it again because suddenly it seems it’s a done deal that we are going to have it forced on us. The best way to give you a taste of what’s wrong with that is a quote from an article by Dr. Cindy Russell of the Santa Clara Medical Association (“A 5G Wireless Future: Will it Give us a Smart Nation or Contribute to an Unhealthy One”).
The quote is from a letter about 5G written to the FCC by Ronald Powell, PhD:
It would greatly extend FCC’s current policy of the mandatory irradiation of the public without adequate prior study of the health impact and assurance of safety. It would irradiate everyone including the most vulnerable to harm from radiofrequency radiation: pregnant women, unborn children, young children, teenagers, men of reproductive age, the elderly, the disabled, and the chronically ill.
Below I list some important articles on 5G and the cell towers that apparently are going to be inflicted on all of us (lots and lots of them) without concern for possible health effects. First I recommend Dr. Russell’s article, at:
Before going to the other articles, I should mention that there are already many people trying to fight off effects of our chronic exposure to electromagnetic radiation with the current technology in use by most of us. They build shelters to put in their bedrooms or systems to put in their attics because even if they shut off their own wifi as much as possible (some have none at home at all any longer) they still suffer from wifi from homes close to them. When they manage to shield themselves successfully they report many painful symptoms disappearing. We figured at our house we’re already swimming in electromagnetic radiation, and it’s likely you are too. We now turn wifi off at night so at least we’re not sleeping in so much of it. This was recommended by a book I read on possible contributors to auto-immune illnesses. Some people think it’s nonsense but there’s much evidence to the contrary.
It’s clear we don’t even know enough about our current state of exposure, so it’s insane to pile on more, wouldn’t you say? If we don’t protest–now rather than later–we’re going to find thousands of new smaller and powerful 5G towers almost in our front yards, and yet have zero control over their effects on us. We have pretty much the same human body we did centuries ago, but it wasn’t exposed to any of this stuff. It’s hard to imagine it not having an effect.
The next warning article is from CBS News, includes some photos. Note that one person interviewed feels she’ll have to move to avoid living next to a tower.
In the article below are details about 5G’s potential health effects, including some studies. It’s thorough, alarming, and proof this is not a good idea, at least not as it’s now planned, should not be forced on us:
Next is a video, and several other links on the subject on that same page you might want to have a look at as well:
And from UK’s Daily Mail:
The above UK report (which is mostly about the US) states that some studies have already linked older wireless service generations to cancers of the reproductive system and heart, and 5G health effects have hardly been studied yet. But still the plan is, without asking us, to inundate us with some 800,000 new cell towers to support 5G. (The report says now we have 154,000.)
These articles make clear that it’s highly irresponsible, unethical, and, might I say, greedy, to bulldoze over the entire US population with hundreds of thousands of new cell towers we can’t trust to be safe.
I’ve already written two of my reps in Congress about 5G, and I hope you’ll do the same if you’re concerned. My purpose in this blog and in my book is to find ways to increase wellbeing for all living things, which mostly cannot be achieved as long as profit always remains king. Yes 5G does some helpful things, but rolling it out untested is not worth the possible price. By the way for what it’s worth the towers don’t look that great and would not be a garden enhancement for sure. You’ll see them in some of the articles.
Go to the next link to see some important notes of one concerned reporter on how a number of people (including some firefighters, notably, who were affected by a 5G tower near them) are desperately trying to prevent–and if not that–escape–a much more difficult task–5G being put near their homes and workplaces due to illness they’ve already experienced when 5G is allowed.
The above information gives you a good idea of what’s going on, but there is much more online including pages on how 5G will benefit the Internet of Things. But don’t let all that excitement distract you from the real possibility that the health and even longevity of many–perhaps all–of us–and animals too (maybe even plant life?) may be in serious danger. Below are a few more of my comments, some of which were on the earlier blog post, should you want to read more.
I’ve seen a variety of opinions on EMFs (electromagnetic fields), but I still find enough negatives to make me want to insist on no further electromagnetic radiation near where I live. An accomplished software engineer I know says he doesn’t see that the new 5G technology is that necessary, especially if it puts people’s health at risk. He says instead what we need is faster connections to people’s houses, which you can do with just wires only. (Full disclosure, I’m married to the software engineer. His name is Victor Preston.)
My understanding is none of us has the power to say “No” to these towers. As one article states it, they’re coming, period. That’s pretty pushy, wouldn’t you say? What I think we need to do then is block this technological “advance” until its proven safe.Why not delay it until it’s known for certain not to cause harm? And if it does cause harm it clearly must be redesigned or scrapped. We’re going to be exposed to this stuff for most hours–maybe all hours–of every day. What’s the big hurry? I’m pretty sure it’s primarily the usual suspect—Big Profit.
We’re already bullied a lot health-wise, and if you want to know more about that read Ty Bollinger’s mind-blowing book The Truth About Cancer. (If everyone read it and helped create change in the system, many of us would recover from illness with less suffering and less expense, and Big Medicine and Big Pharma would be just a little less wealthy—but don’t worry about them—they’ll still be richer than most of us.) Big Money’s tentacles extend into medicine so far beyond what you might imagine that it will make you very angry. But 5G will also add to the enormous cost of healthcare and line the pockets of Big Pharma even more once we all get even sicker which does seem to me likely.
Sadly it may be hard to prove it was 5G that made us sick if it does because the damage may be slow and not necessarily immediately noticeable. What if you move to another location, you ask? I’m afraid that may not be possible, since, though it may start only in select areas, what I’ve read so far indicates those in charge assume eventually it’s going to be everywhere. Even if we could move away from it, how many millions can uproot themselves, and where can they go that won’t have it eventually if those in charge are this set on it?
Another thought: If we don’t stop this plan to dump these towers on us, and we do get sicker, the companies profiting from them will likely find ways to blame any resulting illnesses on something else.
Yet some people are already planning to uproot themselves, as you see in one of the articles, should those towers come into their neighborhoods. But the tragic results of a lot of moving is it will further to destroy what little sense of community some of us have managed to build into our lives. This country desperately needs more sense of community because we’ve lost most of what we did have and many of us are isolated to a degree that’s dangerous to mental (and therefore also physical) health.
The companies pushing 5G–and also governments allowing the towers–should also consider what they may likely have to pay for the lawsuits that will likely show up later due to illness if they charge ahead. But how do you measure tearing apart communities as people try to flee this technology to protect their health?
The time to investigate and to protest is now, before they put all the towers up. I feel bad for the initial test cities, which you see listed in one of the articles. Did those people have any say in the matter? In one of the articles you’ll see that one resident expects property values to go down a lot when the towers come since most people in her area don’t want them. I honestly don’t see how this many towers can be shoved on us all without asking our permission and with so much ignorance about future results. I saw a figure of 800,000 by 2026 for the US. And even if a neighborhood wants them (I doubt that will happen given the risk) each house should be able to say no.
I’m all for technology making our lives better but when health is endangered and anxiety over the technology causes stress and the increased depression (often caused by added prolonged stress), the change is not better. Ignoring such concerns shows a lack of respect for people’s peace of mind, something too little attention is paid to already by government and business, and which deeply affects wellbeing and health and therefore the very length of our lives.
I don’t want to be part of this experiment, or for you to be either. Too often in the past we’ve accepted new technologies without asking enough questions and demanding proof of safety. I believe a good chance to have a healthier, less angst-ridden life is a basic human right, and government and industry need to be reminded of this constantly. It looks as if we’re going to need to stand up to protect our health and wellbeing since government is failing to do it, and because profit can and often does roll over a people like a tank. As I say ad nauseam, enough money is one thing; more and more profit no matter the cost to health of people and the planet is another.
Here’s a novel idea: How about these big companies taking a kinder, wellbeing-promoting route? I urge them to make their money on something known to be safe. If they can’t find safer communication technology, they could turn their vast innovative powers to other businesses desperately needed to make life healthier. They could for example replace some of the many toxic chemicals the FDA allows with safer ingredients. They could work on ways to grow more healthy plant food and feed more people, or find ways to house more people. Instead they’re promoting possible increased illness and more of the chronic anxiety already rampant in our society by forcing 5G on us.