Since I’ve been hearing for years that animal farming converted to plant farming could feed everyone on the planet, and since the animals suffer so horribly, I could never understand why the world had not at least begun to move toward this change. Now of course it’s an even bigger emergency as the Amazon burns and we hear it is again largely because Europe (and I guess other places) wants more and more beef. I looked around to see if anything is being done at all right now with the animal farming issue due to the emergency we now face in the Amazon, and found a page of various contradicting views. Then I found the article I want to tell you about, on the Forbes site:
Who can Really Stop the Amazon Fires? by Justin Adams.
It makes a lot of sense because Adams sees that in order to make the needed changes we have to support the businesses reliant on earnings from their current activities that damage the forests (such as cattle farming). I have always believed something similar to this kind of thinking is the solution to most of our problems. Make sure those who would lose money due to the changes are pretty well supported financially while we help then to convert to something less harmful, or ideally not at all harmful.
I urge you to read Adams’ article (it’s not too long) and encourage your government leaders, as I now do, to use this and similar methods as soon as possible to help save the rainforest, but also in other cases where there is any emergency that causes suffering of living beings, human or animal, caused by a business that’s the livelihood of people who also need to survive. As for the Amazon right now, in addition to the health of the planet that’s already in dire straits from global warming, don’t forget all those beautiful and often-endangered forest animals who are suffering and dying in the flames, or the healing and sometimes life-saving Amazon plants experts have been discovering that are now being destroyed.
Sure it will cost money to support the businesses as they convert to something else, but what is money for if not to keep our Earth healthy so we, the animals, and the plants can all thrive? And what will it cost if we don’t make the changes? Of course we’ll also have to stop eating beef and using many other animal products, and help businesses to find ways to produce other things we need (as Adams discusses) that don’t harm the trees. Don’t be afraid of this. Innovation is alive and well in the world and much has already been done to solve the problem of what to use for food, clothing, shoes, and other products, instead of using animals or using harmful methods when safer ones are available. Many of us have been doing that for some time and have become much healthier than we used to be (myself included). We also feel free of the burden of knowing we no longer cause suffering, though we get depressed about how much suffering continues.
Meat substitutes are getting fairly sophisticated, though I don’t crave them and find getting creative with plant food healthier and surprisingly enjoyable. Imagine the resulting decrease and maybe even ending of the current 24/7 agony of beautiful, innocent animals. You may not hear their cries of terror and pain, but believe me the suffering goes on all the time. How blissful would it be to know we’re ending it as a side effect of saving the planet and feeding the world’s hungry? But we’ll also be helping decrease other damage, as Adams describes, by using less harmful methods to get products we need from the forests. There’s a reason they call the Amazon rainforest “the lungs of the planet.” Do we really want to leave a barely livable planet to future generations? Our children are already angry with us for much of what they see now. Let’s not wait and discuss it endlessly. The time for action is now.
Adams describes the kind of things that can be done logically and clearly. He gives me hope. Please do read the article. Here’s the link: