Upcoming Online Summits on 5G Wireless, & Reminder to Please Hurry to Sign Petition Against 5G

There are three new online summits on 5G Wireless beginning very soon that can further inform you and help you protect yourself and your family. from what are likely serious health effects caused by this untested technology. Again 5G is NOT necessary and we’re being bullied into having it surround us, even though there’s a great deal of evidence that the EMF radiation we’re already soaking in is harming our health.

I hope to continue to get petition signers from everywhere to sign my petition against 5G, again modeled on one from Helsinki, but am now also making a special call to residents of my state of Massachusetts, because I know for certain 5G Wireless is getting underway here right now. However I think you can still use my petition to show your own state and local governments how many people are disturbed by this roll-out with no warning and no way out (except protests like this). Here’s that petition link:

https://www.thepetitionsite.com/813/839/624/stop-5g-and-smart-meters/?taf_id=62109181&cid=twitter#bbfb=791069356

Upcoming Summits

Further down is a little of my husband’s and my experience in attempting to decrease current types of EMF radiation so far, but first, here are the summits if you want to do some more reading on 5G Wireless.

Here’s the link to one summit, presented by HealthMeans:

https://mail.google.com/mail/ca/u/0/#search/5G/WhctKJVRPLjGxwrCBrwfXvKbWwXlNpMGVxSQvgpwPRrPHXnQQPgkxlqlPHkZJSLqCVZfGvq?compose=DXDwSWxDjFhLFHgwQHKcVCnnJWszRlqztKTJsRbFSrBCNGDbLgcPHnmjlFcRpsztBZmzLmjxckBqJBgWZbbMCQMTXcMWnLWfHLsvFwWpwVLLQRHRZMhwvMZL

A second summit is being presented by Dr. Jay Davidson:

https://mail.google.com/mail/ca/u/0/#search/5G/WhctKJVRQLqxXxjGnbKTRxNXZVcnSDFWTGNrtvBGTkPlxFssCqMxJLTbfqqQWMhWfsthMVQ?compose=DXDwSWxDjFhLFHgwQHKcVCnnJWszRlqztKTJsRbFSrBCNGDbLgcPHnmjlFcRpsztBZmzLmjxckBqJBgWZbbMCQMTXcMWnLWfHLsvFwWpwVLLQRHRZMhwvMZL

A third summit begins July 17th, hosted by “EMF Guy” Nick Pineault

https://mail.google.com/mail/ca/u/0/#search/Nick/WhctKJVRQLqzXrFWbwvzPpmsrnnntrcMPZWCnzWftxLJVTBlwSgpMGkNttzprKwmfrBpGwV?compose=DXDwSWxDjFhLFHgwQHKcVCnnJWszRlqztKTJsRbFSrBCNGDbLgcPHnmjlFcRpsztBZmzLmjxckBqJBgWZbbMCQMTXcMWnLWfHLsvFwWpwVLLQRHRZMhwvMZL

Our Experience So Far

At home we’ve started to measure EMF radiation in different rooms. If you want to do this I recommend you get one of those devices you can measure it with, and hold it near anything plugged in, and in places where you sit often, or sleep. We bought one that’s a little more expensive than the cheapest one offered by Nick Pineault. His site is https://theemfguy.com/ and he’s one of the summit hosts.

We looked around and ended up buying the TriField EMF Meter Model TF2. It measures all three types of electromagnetic pollution (EMF)–electric, magnetic, and radio frequency. It cost us $168 on Amazon. They have cheaper ones but this one got a good review that said it’s pretty accurate and covers more kinds of EMF than many do. We even found something free on the phone but it only measures wifi. (We have no connection with Trifield.)

We took some measurements in our bedroom at home and the increases in radiation in some locations were so high we unplugged many things, and no longer charge things near the bed. Sometimes unplugging makes no difference so you have to hunt around a little, and sometimes you just don’t know where the increase is coming from. (That’s why I suggest looking at links I’ve given you and at some of the summits. We’ll be doing that too.) We also moved the head of our bed about 18 inches from the wall because up next to the wall the numbers went so much higher. This may be because a meter outside the house isn’t far from the bed, or because we’re getting radiation from the house next door which isn’t too far away from where we sleep.

When we measured our electric cords we were measuring on the electric setting of the Trifield meter, and when we measured wifi and phones we used the radio frequency setting. For behind the headboard of the bed we used the electric setting. We tried measuring there with the other settings but they showed no increase. So you might have to try all three to make sure something’s okay.

We even found many lamps made the meter jump up high. We thought it was the bulbs but changing them to different types only made a little difference. LEDs did seem to make somewhat less EMF than compact fluorescents. so we changed most bulbs to LED. We found that staying 6 inches away from the lamps even with the LEDs lowered the radiation a little more. But check each lamp, your fans, etc. since sometimes there are surprises.

Aluminum foil is said to decrease the radiation, and my husband held some between the wall and the headboard and it did decrease it. (He also tried some thin sheets of steel and they made no difference.) So we’re going to try (till we learn of something better, if there is anything) wrapping poster board with foil and put the foil side against the wall, then move the bed back where it was. The headboard hopefully will hide the poster board but if we have to have the foil further up the wall to get the radiation lower, I guess we’ll have to paint or somehow decorate the wall to make it look okay. There may be other things we can do with the bed and with other areas, but we’re still studying the var sites and sources I’ve listed for you here,on several of my 5G posts, and on the petition site.

The Stealthy Roll-Out of 5G

Why aren’t you hearing much about 5G Wireless? Because those forcing it on us know many of us want no part of it, so they’ve quietly arranged to quietly set it up. And as I’ve mentioned, your health worries or even illnesses you or your children already have will not help you stop them. They’ve made a law saying in effect no health excuses allowed. As I’ve mentioned, Trump wants it right away to compete with China which also wants it right away. They don’t care about its likely damage to health, that it’s untested, and makes everything much more easily hackable. Whatever you’re worried about, up at the top, where this is coming from, they don’t care. (Were you ever asked how you felt about 5G? We certainly were not.)

Personally I’ve had enough of this. Hence my petition. Please do go there and sign it, and may I make a plea again especially for residents of Massachusetts to sign now? Also wherever you are, do feel free to use my petition as a template to set one up in your state or city. Again here’s the petition link: https://www.thepetitionsite.com/813/839/624/stop-5g-and-smart-meters/?taf_id=62109181&cid=twitter#bbfb=791069356

Greed & Power vs. Wellbeing

Please stay safe, watch what your state and town are doing, and protest when needed. The best way to decrease stress in the American City or anywhere (a major goal of mine) is to get government and business to understand that highest profits often contribute to decreased wellbeing. We need to convince them that just-high-enough profits (and good enough technology, and reining in some leaders’ bottomless egos requiring more and more personal power and fame) can help promote or at least maintain wellbeing.

Wellbeing includes both mental and physical health, and ours is declining as we’re bullied into lifestyles controlled by ever-wealthier high tech moguls and their buddies in high places. In fact doing whatever causes less stress, fear, depression, and illness saves tons of money in healthcare, crime, etc., so the rich and powerful can still do very well without destroying wellbeing for everyone else. Because they seem unable or unwilling to step back and acknowledge that, we’re on our own, and we need to make a big stink about 5G Wireless. Now is the time.

Smart Meters

Susan Cooke

Along with 5G we now have SMART METERS–not a good thing

I’m hoping my messages on 5G are beginning to get to more people so they understand what’s coming, since the federal government seems to have no interest in discussing it with them. I’ll get back to fighting 5G  in the next post. Meanwhile I’m sorry to report that we now also have Smart Meters to contend with. I learned about them first from the EMF Safety Network, which urges us to oppose them along with 5G—and I only learned about these new utility meters this week. (You can look at home now to check whether you have one—check your meters for  electric, water, and gas. You want to keep “analog” meters, and resist having them swapped for smart meters.) We’ve now written letters to our utilities begging them not to replace our meters with smart ones, not that we expect that to go over well.

After we wrote our letters, I discovered the pages at a link below from the site, “Stop Smart Meters.org.” that have more explicit directions on how to fight this supposed improved technology. I suggest having a look at those if you’re not up on the plans for us that we once again had no say in. If you look at the photos on both pages, you can see some examples of what the meters look like (they don’t all look the same). It appears the meter often says “smart meter” right on it, but might also say AMI or AMR, or maybe even other labels we don’t know about yet so check your meters, and if it’s not clear, call that utility and ask. You have the right to know if you’ve got smart meters or not. Here are those links:

https://stopsmartmeters.org/frequently-asked-questions/faq-smart-meter-basics/

EMF Safety Network says utility companies worldwide are replacing analog electric, gas, and water meters with “pulsed radiation smart meter networks.” This despite known health effects already, no informing of the public about the change, not mentioning the possibilities for much easier hacking (which apparently is a known problem with 5G in general already), and privacy invasion. The meters by the way eliminate meter reader jobs, provide information on your private habits such as when you cook, watch TV, have lights on or not, and whether you are at home or not. EMF Safety says California utilities have admitted giving this information to the government and other third parties! As for health effects, on the same page I linked you to above, be sure to read what’s under the heading “Health Hazard,” but I mention some (not all) effects further down.

To be clear, Big Government and Big Tech are now adding smart meter networks, along with 5G, just about everywhere, to the growing soup of radio frequencies (RFs) we’re being forced to swim in, with no healthcare protests even allowed to be considered in the case of 5G, and I rather doubt my and my husband’s own requests not to get smart meters will be fulfilled. So you cannot ask not to have one of the 5G small cell towers near your home for health reasons. (Well, you can ask, and we plan to, but the law allows your pleas to be ignored.) This has already thrown people all over the country into a panic, with some taking difficult and expensive steps to try to shield themselves or their sick children, or grappling with the idea of moving. But where can you move that will be free of this stuff–a mountaintop somewhere? Nope, they’re going to beam 5G from satellites, unless we stop them. Oh, and there’s a plan to put it in babies’ diapers.

Are you worried about complications or new health issues already associated with chronic bombardment from all this RF? Already turning off Wifi at night because you suspect or know your symptoms are likely wifi-related and feel you surely won’t be able to handle even more with 5G or the effects of smart meters added to the load? Too bad for you. Big Tech and Big Government don’t care about your headaches, auto-immune issues, pacemaker issues, or increasing anxiety and/or depression. Both the latter two are rampant in the U.S. population already, and just the fact that people are being bullied can add greatly to both their anxiety and depression, aside from the stress of fear of health effects. Most people care about the planet too, unlike the current White House, and many are already depressed as they watch it continue on its path toward destruction by climate change due to–again–ego, greed, and impulsivity most people over the age of seven would not dare allow in themselves once they knew what was at stake.

So know that those in charge already know many of us will ask not to have a tower near our homes for health reasons, and they’re therefore gotten ahead of us by making a law that lets them say “Tough luck, you’re getting it anyway.” So we’ll have effects of smart meters and 5G at home as well as at work, in stores, in restaurants, and, if the spread of them increases as planned, everywhere we go–outside, inside, home, and on vacation. It sounds to me as if there will be nowhere to escape. I’d be delighted if someone convinced me I’m mistaken about this, but if you read the news stories and comments of many scientists not in favor of these changes so far, it’s hard to be convinced.

Don’t look to the President, top FCC officials, or Big Tech companies for answers. It looks like they’ll all be getting richer and/or getting huge ego kicks out of making our country the lead World Tech Power with this stuff. Why do we all have to suffer–even if we don’t end up having health effects–with having the fear of them, so those few people can grab some extra wealth and what they see as glory (I guess)? That’s insane and clearly those people have enough money and power already. Yes the US is competing with China and other countries also adding this technology, countries who also shouldn’t have begun using it either. But this is such an enormous health (and privacy and hackability) issue that all populations should have been consulted with and informed before any changes were made (not likely in China but in matters of health and wellbeing dictators including the current US tone seem the least trustworthy of all).

This rollout should never have begun without the people’s consent due to the stunningly irresponsible lack of testing, lack of knowledge about future effects, and the widespread plans nevertheless to put it everywhere–and quickly. (What’s the hurry? “Quickly” adopted new technology didn’t work so well for Boeing, did it?) These self-interested entities have no answers for you as to the possible damage because they have no idea themselves, or they do have an idea, and unbelievably, especially if they have children or grandchildren, they don’t care. It’s clear that it’s up to the people to stop it.

The EMF Safety group says the World Health Organization categorizes RF as a 2B carcinogen, the same as DDT and lead, adding that thousands of studies have linked RF exposure to increased cancer risk and nervous system damage, to name a couple (there’s a link to more on their page). Pulsed radiation from smart meters has already caused tinnitus, memory loss, and seizures, and further down the page you can see a litany of customer complaints including headaches, sleep problems, anxiety, palpitations, dizziness, nausea, ear pain, and more. This same page also reports something especially significant:  the American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) has already called for a halt to wireless smart meters.

Groups especially vulnerable to RF health issues include pregnant women, seniors, people with known EMF sensitivities, medical implants, compromised immune systems, and those with pacemakers, who were warned by one organization to stay at least 6 inches away from all smart meters. (I imagine this would be hard to remember at all times, especially if the pacemaker patient is older as they often are, and might not be able to read the meter from 6 inches, even with glasses or a magnifying glass).

The page on smart meters also reports home fires, explosions, and burnt out appliances. See that page for details on all this as well as how costs will increase, and just how smart meters will work. Look further down to see how Californians have struggled with trying not to have, or to get rid of, Smart Meters.

The EMF safety group adds that smart meters already show evidence of environmental harm (see on the page a photo of a dying shrub next to a meter). I can’t see how all this added radio frequency (when for most of the earth and living beings’ history there was none) wouldn’t harm the environment in multiple not-yet-known ways including many that may not show up for years, just as human and animal illnesses such as cancer from it may not show up for years. I can’t imagine it not affecting bees, butterflies, other insects, and birds—all of which have exceedingly complex systems that guide them on annual trips across wide distances and back, systems we don’t fully understand yet. I can’t imagine it not affecting other wildlife, farm animals and pets, and due to effects on wildlife and insects, even flowering plants and food crops.

We’re risking, along with the increased immediate negative health issues already being reported in many people, the unbalancing of many delicate environmental systems necessary for the health and survival of all living things. People in power who don’t believe in science won’t get this, which is another reason the rest of us have to speak up. We’re already causing death and destruction by not stopping all practices that delay global warming. As is so often the case many in power can’t seem to learn that just because a new technology is available doesn’t mean we need to add to the planet’s woes by rushing into using it. In many past cases new technologies should never have been allowed to be established (nuclear power—that turned out well).

Why do we not learn this? I think part of it is we’re in such a hurry to get from one minute to the next in our frantic daily lives, or simply to get rich (and/or more powerful in some cases), and get there fast, we forget to or choose not to think. Remember thinking? Admittedly not much modeling of it is going on now in our government, but it’s generally a very useful practice.

So these relatively few individuals pushing this technology on all living things on earth and on the earth itself are committing what I can only see as a criminal act. It denies us in this country, of what was, I thought, our inalienable right to the pursuit of happiness. How can you have a hope of being happy when you’ve lost control over your own fate, and been forced to turn your health and quite possibly your lifespan, as well as the health of the planet you likely (hopefully) love, over to a few self-interested people who grabbed some power awhile ago. Their actions are unconscionable, unethical, and immoral, .

More soon on fighting both smart meters and 5G together, but you can begin now by protesting vehemently to your reps in government at all levels. Your state or city may already have a group that’s prepared petitions and other protests. Many Californians are working on this, and there’s an active group and petition fighting 5G in Finland. You can see and translate their petition at:

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=fi&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.kansalaisaloite.fi%2Ffi%2Faloite%2F3844

5G–New, fast, profitable, & possibly quite dangerous

Susan Cooke

Please pardon my long absence, caused by a need for lots of time  to research an upcoming post designed to help people find cleaner-running, quieter landscape tools, and therefore find city life a little less stressful. I interrupted that work to bring up something really important that I feel can’t wait. Let’s look at a new technology that may be affecting your health soon:  It’s called 5G.

Below are several links to articles I’ve found on 5G and the cell towers that apparently are going to be inflicted on all of us (lots and lots of them) without much concern for possible health effects. Personally I have enough to do battling and living with city stress both for myself and others already. It’s upsetting to me that  no matter what we do to be healthy–which is challenge enough in the modern world– we may have our efforts sabotaged by thousands of new barely-studied 5G cell towers near us, and have no control over what they might do to us. We already live and work in buildings full of people using a wide array of electromagnetic equipment about which there’s still not conclusive evidence of safety.  We have pretty much the same human body we did centuries ago but it wasn’t exposed to all this stuff 24/7.

If you’re concerned or want to know more, I hope you’ll take a look at these articles. I’ll mention a few more things before the articles come up below.

I’ve seen a variety of opinions on EMFs (electromagnetic fields), but I still find enough negatives to make me want to insist on no further electromagnetic radiation near where I live.  An accomplished software engineer I know says he doesn’t see that the new 5G technology is that necessary, especially if it puts people’s health at risk. He says instead what we need is faster connections to people’s houses, which you can do with  just wires only. (Full disclosure,  I’m married to the software engineer. His name is Victor Preston.)

We figured at our house we’re probably already swimming in electromagnetic radiation, and it’s likely you are too. We now turn wifi off at night so at least we’re not sleeping in so much of it.  (This was recommended to me by a book I read on possible causes of auto-immune illnesses.) Still, as a person with a PTSD brain and who seems to have a couple of ailments there are no explanations for (blood tests normal) like chronic fatigue) I’m not happy about having another not-well-understood threat added to the mix I’m living in. My understanding is none of us has the power to say “No” to these towers. As one article states it, they’re coming, period. That’s pretty pushy, wouldn’t you say? What I think we need to do then is block this technological “advance” until its proven safe for adults, kids, and animals.

Why not delay it until it’s known for certain not to cause harm? And if it does cause harm it clearly must be redesigned or scrapped. We’re going to be exposed to this stuff for most hours–maybe all hours–of every day. What’s the big hurry?  I suspect the usual–big money.

Unless and until  there’s proof all this activity in our environment is not already making people sick, we shouldn’t  allow ourselves to be bullied into accepting even more of it that’s even more untested.  If we don’t stop this plan to dump these towers on us, and we do get sicker, the companies profiting from them will likely just find ways to blame any resulting illnesses on something else.

Some people are already planning to uproot themselves and move just to get away from the towers (but where can they go?) This works further to destroy sense of community, which this country desperately needs more of–and it’s another way the towers will harm wellbeing. The companies–and also governments allowing the towers–should also consider what they may likely have to pay for the lawsuits that will likely show up later due to illness if they charge ahead.

The time to investigate and to protest is now, before they put all the towers up. I feel bad for the initial test cities, which you’ll see listed in one of the articles. Did those people have any say in the matter? In one of the articles you’ll see that one resident expects property values to go down a lot when the towers come since most people in her area don’t want them. I honestly don’t see how this many towers can be shoved on us all without asking our permission and with so much ignorance about future results. I saw a figure of 800,000 by 2026 for the US.  And even if a neighborhood wants them (I doubt that will happen given the risk) each house should be able to say no.

I’m all for technology making our lives better but when health is endangered and anxiety over the technology causes stress and the increased depression often caused by added prolonged stress, the change is not better.  Ignoring such concerns shows a lack of respect for people’s peace of mind, something too little attention is paid to already by government and business, and which deeply affects wellbeing and health and therefore the very length of our lives. It looks as if we’re going to need to stand up to protect our health and wellbeing since government is failing to do it,  and because profit can and often does roll over a people like a tank. As I say ad nauseam, enough money is one thing; more and more profit no matter the cost to health of people and the planet is another.

Those planning on big profits from 5G need to keep in mind the potential increased healthcare costs caused by more illness, not to mention the suffering. Is it worth the trade-off, especially if you’re making the public angry in the process?

I don’t want to be part of this experiment, or for you to be either. Too often in the past  we’ve accepted new technologies without asking enough questions and demanding proof of safety.  I believe a good chance to have a healthier, less angst-ridden life is a basic human right, and government and industry need to be reminded of this constantly.

I’ve already written two of my reps in Congress about 5G, and I hope you’ll do the same if you’re concerned. My  purpose in this blog and in my book is to find ways to increase wellbeing for all living things, and to show that profit need not always be king. Yes 5G does some helpful things, but it doesn’t seem near worth the possible price. If it’s forced on us where I live, I don’t know what I’ll do or where we can go, and am feeling more anxiety because of it–not good for the immune system! (By the way the towers don’t look that great either and would not be a garden enhancement for sure.)

Here’s a novel idea:  How about these big companies taking a kinder, wellbeing-promoting route? I urge them companies to make their money on something known to be safe. If they can’t find safer communication technology, they could turn their vast innovative powers to other businesses desperately needed to make life healthier. They could for example replace some of the many toxic chemicals the FDA allows with safer ingredients. They could work on ways to grow more healthy plant food and feed more people, or find ways to house more people. Instead they’re promoting possible increased illness and more of the chronic anxiety already rampant in our society by forcing 5G on us.

Before getting to the articles on 5G, I want to mention, for those of you who are interested, what I also just read about transformer boxes (a related issue). If you want to skip it just go to the next paragraph after the link to an article discussing these boxes.

We made a point when choosing our house not to get one near one of those transformer boxes on poles we were warned might have bad effects on health. I just read in a response by an aerospace scientist to one of the articles that the bigger wires running from those boxes may be also be a big health problem. To see an interesting discussion on transformers alone and on the effect of “hum” and vibrations related to them (all news to me),  go to this link:

https://www.quora.com/How-dangerous-is-electrical-transformer-for-human-health-if-it-is-near-to-house

Below are the articles. If 5G makes you nervous I hope you’ll alert those in power in business and government, including local government, that you’re worried and that you don’t want it around until and unless it’s proven to be 100% safe for health (which I doubt can happen for some time if ever).

Meanwhile, stay well and I’ll be back soon with quieter landscape options. Here are the article links and a couple of comments on some of them:


The first, from CBS News, includes some photos. Note that one person interviewed feels she’ll have to move to avoid living next to a tower.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/5g-network-cell-towers-raise-health-concerns-for-some-residents/

———————————

This next article details some of the worries about 5G’s health effects including some studies. It’s thorough, alarming, and I think proof this is not a good idea, at least not as it’s now planned, and it should not be forced on us:

Why 5G Cell Towers Are More Dangerous


Next an important article from Environmental Health Trust:

For this one please just google “5G and the IOT: Scientific Overview of Human Health Risks”   (Sorry, I can’t make a link on some of these without pulling up a big piece of the article. If searching for this title doesn’t work, please go to the main site first, which is:  Environmental Health Trust, then search for the 5G title.)


Here’s one from ConsumerWatch (I had same problem with making a link with this one):  Please google “ConsumerWatch: 5G Cellphone Towers Signal Renewed Concerns Over Impacts on Health”


And from UK’s Daily Mail:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-5784487/The-roll-5G-wireless-service-massive-health-experiment-public-health-expert-warns-a.html

The above UK report (which is mostly about the US) states that some studies have already linked older wireless service generations to cancers of the reproductive system and heart, and 5G health effects have hardly been studied yet. But still the plan is, without asking us, to inundate us with some 800,000 new cell towers to support 5G. (The report says now we have 154,000.)

————————————

These articles and reports make clear that it’s highly irresponsible, unethical, and, might I say, greedy, to bulldoze over the entire US population with hundreds of thousands of new cell towers we certainly can’t trust to be safe.